Leaving it all to the imagination

In one of my writer’s forums, the topic was- how much description does a reader want? The questioner disliked descriptive detail unnecessary to the plot, preferring to let their own imagination build the scene and populate the character attributes. 

I found this very interesting, and the commenters to this post either loved as much detail as possible or wanted the description at a bare minimum. Readers do have their own preferences that are not met by the writer.

I confess I love descriptions! They set the scene and fix the main characters in my mind, particularly if the details offered are important to the story. Description allows us to see the character’s or the author’s vision. If we strip it down too much, the reader will build their own world.

I enjoy detailed descriptions of minor characters that help to form an opinion of them. Is the character a stately older woman rather than greying and tired, or is she small and frail? Does the man show signs of dissipation through his sallow skin and ruddy nose or drooping eyes? Does a debutante have jewels laced through intricately styled, gleaming hair versus the untidy bun with curls escaping their pins? Are their clothes new and fashionable, or have they been altered from hand-me-downs? These details are important to build the character.

What the environment looks like is important, too. Sometimes descriptions will let you see the scene through the eyes of your character. Is the house tidy and kept clean by many unseen hands? Is the furnishing old and musty? I probably under-describe in my writing, resisting the urge to tell everyone what I am seeing in my imagination down to the last detail. This is the dilemma. 

In A Misalliance with Love, the state of Sir Gaylord’s house is important to illustrate his character. While the main character, Rosie, is refurbishing her house, and there is a lot of description which illustrates the fact that she is starting from scratch and building a home of her own. I resisted adding more description of that process and let Sinclair reveal it when he sees it for the first time. Later in the book, Sinclair sees his childhood home with fresh eyes as he gives Rosie a tour.

It is a matter of personal taste, and some of us want to know what flowers are blooming in the gardens and whether the manor house is shrouded in mist.

Four things are essential in a historical romance book, in my opinion: character, action, emotion, and ambiance, and I think all four should solidly build the scene. The ambiance is often neglected, I find.

In much of my writing, I give the reader the freedom to decide on the attire and physical appearance of many characters, presenting only essential details to enhance the setting and atmosphere. Is it too much or too little? That is for the reader to decide.

Rosie and Sinclair must talk-A Misalliance with Love.

Rosie sat by herself in her favorite armchair by the fire with an unopened book in her lap.

She had hoped he would grow to like her. Instead, he had burst in talking about bills and people visiting her when he had never shown any interest in what she had planned. He never asked her how she would staff the house. She had tried to keep him informed about the modifications.
Rosie took a sip of her port, feeling the warmth spread through her body. She had been dreading this conversation since they sat down in the library, but she knew it was necessary.

A Misalliance with Love

Rosie’s thoughts-A Misalliance with Love

“Rosie knew that she had said some things to him in anger, things that she regretted now. When she had asked him to leave her alone, she had not meant it in the way that he had taken it. But it seemed that he was too proud to reach out to her or too ashamed of her to even consider trying to make things right between them. She knew that he would never have chosen her as a wife if it were not for the horrible incident at the Sunderland Ball . . .”

Dinner scenes make me so hungry!

One thing I’ve noticed in historical romance novels is that the female main character rarely has a healthy appetite. Why is that? An author can describe a meal where course after succulent course is brought to the table, yet our heroine either has no appetite or has quickly lost it and ends up pushing food around her plate. Don’t these scenes make you hungry?

I confess that when I read these passages, I cringe. I want her to eat to her full and savor every bite and forget all the silly conversations that make her so nervous. Gorge yourself, girl!

Instead, she picks and prods at her food, sometimes not taking a single bite of a meal that sounds heavenly. This is the norm.
Just another little detail I never fail to notice.